<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
	<channel>
<title>My RSS Feed</title><link>http://renato.iannella.it/index.html</link><description>Blogs</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:creator>renato@iannella.it</dc:creator><dc:rights>Copyright 2008-10 Renato Iannella</dc:rights><dc:date>2010-06-17T10:54:03+10:00</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.realmacsoftware.com/" />
<admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:renato@iannella.it" /><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:49:04 +1000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Why I quit Facebook (integrity intact)</title><dc:creator>renato@iannella.it</dc:creator><category>privacy</category><dc:date>2010-06-17T10:54:03+10:00</dc:date><link>http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/fb-integrity.html#unique-entry-id-10</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/fb-integrity.html#unique-entry-id-10</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><br />As a researcher in the space of privacy and social networks, Facebook has been a great real-world use case of the pitfalls that these services need to deal with, and the challenges to researchers and developers to solve....Google runs a close second.<br />I contemplated leaving Facebook on May 31st (the </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://www.quitfacebookday.com/" rel="external">Quit FaceBook Day</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; ">) but decided not too. After all, I should be aware of the issues and technically capable to control my Privacy options on Facebook (and any other Social Network...)<br />However, today I feel insulted by the CEO of Facebook (Mr Mark Zuckerberg) as his recent negative comments about multiple identities on social networks (eg one for work, one for family, one for soccer mates, etc) - which in my view is essential for social systems to support as this is how humans naturally behave - with this </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://social.venturebeat.com/2010/05/13/zuckerberg-privacy/" rel="external">quote</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; ">:<br /><br />	</span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">&ldquo;Having two identities for yourself is an example of a lack of integrity&rdquo;<br /></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><br />So, Mr Zukerberg thinks I lack integrity. This from a person who called all social network users </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://www.news.com.au/technology/claim-mark-zuckerberg-called-thefacebook-users-dumb-fks-for-offering-personal-details/story-e6frfro0-1225866756509" rel="external">&ldquo;dumb f...ks&rdquo;</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "> for sharing information.<br /><br />Thank you Mr Zukerberg, you have made the decision to leave that much easier now.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />  <br /><br /></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The Semantic Web is like a Box of Chocolates</title><dc:creator>renato@iannella.it</dc:creator><category>Semantic Web</category><dc:date>2010-06-16T11:09:57+10:00</dc:date><link>http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/sw-chocolates.html#unique-entry-id-9</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/sw-chocolates.html#unique-entry-id-9</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><br />The Semantic Web has had its challenges over the years in trying to become mainstream. One of the most promising subareas (that has the best chance) is Linked Data. Not that LD is dependent on the SW - all you really need is consistent and persistent URIs and a way to say &ldquo;sameAs&rdquo; in a number of ways....SKOS could help here.<br /><br />Anyway, TBL&rsquo;s recent talk entitled &ldquo;Linked data: it's is not like that; it's like a bag of potato chips&rdquo; (see the </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://www.w3.org/QA/2010/05/linked_data_its_is_not_like_th.html" rel="external">video and blog</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; ">) was not the answer. LD is not like a Bag of Chips. The information on the back has been standardised by government and social requirements. There is no linking between a &ldquo;nut allergy&rdquo; on a Italian bag of chips to an Australian bag of chips. The analogy falls short.<br /><br />I agree there needs to be better efforts to explain all parts of the SW to broaden it&rsquo;s impact, and we really  need good use cases, analogies, stories to do it....<br /><br />Other wise we will end up with the Semantic Web being like a box of chocolates !<br /></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Dated URIs are Not That Cool</title><dc:creator>renato@iannella.it</dc:creator><dc:subject>My Blog</dc:subject><dc:date>2010-03-10T12:02:17+10:00</dc:date><link>http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/uri-dated.html#unique-entry-id-8</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/uri-dated.html#unique-entry-id-8</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><br />Sometimes putting dates in URIs is good. These are nice and human friendly:<br /><br />  http://example.com/2005/annual-report<br />  http://example.com/reports/2005/<br /><br />When the W3C TAG released their findings on </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/metaDataInURI-31.html" rel="external">The Use of Metatdata in URIs</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; ">, I make several comments to the public list about the use of </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Nov/0044.html" rel="external">Dates in URIs</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "> back in 2006.<br /><br />The use of a date (eg year) to indicate when the URL was first created, and then subsequent paths added to the parent URI over time was a poor indicator for the human because they would infer that the date was the date of the </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; font-weight:bold; font-weight:bold; ">resource</span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; ">.<br /><br />So the above two URL are fine (the inference holds), but others do not, and do so badly:<br /><br />  http://example.com/2005/marketing/events.html<br /><br />Are these events in 2005?<br /><br />My point was that the date should be relevant to the resource (that the URI points to) not when the URL was created.<br /><br />It gets worse. Just recently the W3C TAG released a new report:<br /><br />  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/sum03.html<br /><br />Wow? What do those dates mean?<br /></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Linked Data For the Masses?</title><dc:creator>renato@iannella.it</dc:creator><category>Semantic Web</category><category>Linked Data</category><dc:date>2010-02-23T11:13:18+10:00</dc:date><link>http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/ld-masses.html#unique-entry-id-7</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/ld-masses.html#unique-entry-id-7</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><br />In a </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/02/19/response-to-my-linked-data-challenge/" rel="external">must-read blog</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; ">, Brian Kelly looks deeply into Linked Data and asks if we have progressed since 1998 when Tim Berners Lee was looking for a </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://www.w3.org/Talks/1998/0415-Evolvability/slide29-0.htm" rel="external">Green Car under $15K here in Queensland</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; ">.<br /><br />The results are not what the Semantic Web community would like to see:<br /><br /></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><em>&ldquo;the similarly trivial question which Tim Berners-Lee used back in 1998 &ndash; Is there a green car for sale for around $15000 in Queensland? &ndash; was perhaps responsible for misleading people into thinking the Semantic Web was for ordinary end users.   I am now starting to wonder whether a better strategy for those involved in Linked Data activities would be to purposely distance it from typical  end users and target, instead, identified niche areas.&rdquo;</em></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><br /><br />This resonates with my </span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><a href="http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/sw-harmful.html" rel="external" title="My Blog:The Semantic Web Considered Harmful?">first blog</a></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; ">:<br /><br /></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><em>&ldquo;Could the Semantic Web be harmful? It could if it continues to steer resources towards an unobtainable goal in web-scale terms. Such resources could be used to provide more grass-roots level solutions&rdquo;</em></span><span style="font:13px Trebuchet, Verdana, serif; "><br /><br />We still have a long way to go....<br /><br /></span></p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>Cool URIs DO Change</title><dc:creator>renato@iannella.it</dc:creator><category>URI</category><category>Addressing</category><dc:date>2010-02-02T09:38:21+10:00</dc:date><link>http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/uri-notcool.html#unique-entry-id-6</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/uri-notcool.html#unique-entry-id-6</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Think that http URIs are cool....]]></content:encoded></item><item><title>The Semantic Web Considered Harmful?</title><dc:creator>renato@iannella.it</dc:creator><category>Semantic Web</category><dc:date>2008-11-24T09:52:08+10:00</dc:date><link>http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/sw-harmful.html#unique-entry-id-5</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://renato.iannella.it/blog/files/sw-harmful.html#unique-entry-id-5</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[Should we worry about the Semantic Web? Read on...]]></content:encoded></item></channel>
</rss>